Semantic Web

The Way We Work: Tweeting, Twining, Tumbling - Social Media and New Web Services

Recently I've been looking into new web2.0 and, I guess web3.0, and social media trends - sites and services that are popping up like mushrooms after a rain. I've found many interesting one and wanted to share a few, and at the same time ask that if you know of anything really cool that you think I might not know about, please send it my way, either by email/contact form or tag them on del.icio.us for:gregoryheller

CivicActions and our Semantic Web friend - Ben Nowack - working with W3C

CivicActions is happy for its work with Ben Nowack, who has been named "Invited Expert" of the W3C, the MIT associated group which maintains web standards around things like XML, HTML, and CSS! Ben will be enhancing some of his Open Source software called ARC for his company SemSol, which we use in some of our projects.

What Does a VC Think About Web 2.0?

"Much of the "easy" innovation seems to have been wrung out of the Web 2.0 wave. Web 2.0 was cheap - thanks to open source, simple - thanks to RSS/REST, and distinctive - thanks to AJAX and Flash." "Now the hard work begins, again. The next wave of innovation isn't going to be as easy. The hard problems in the WWW are no longer usability or ease of everyday content creation. These problems are solved." "Now the hard part is moving from Web-as-Digital-Printing-Press to true Web-as-Platform. To make the Web a platform there has to a level of of content and services interoperability that really doesn't exist today."

Index Building for NINA search application

A quick screen cast of one of NINA's adminstrative features. This allows the user to selectively build indexes for the search application.

The cool part, I think, is that even though PHP doesn't have threading, using client side javsacript and jQuery you can simulate threaded message passing.

Flickr opens "Machine tags" to their entire user base

Flickr seems to have figured out a nice, user friendly way to use tags that have relevance to the Semantic Web. Really great idea. From the article: Like tags, there are no rules for machine tags beyond the syntax to specify the parts of a machine tag. For example, you could tag a photo with : * flickr:user=straup * flora:tree=coniferous * medium:paint=oil * geo:cartier="plateau mont royal" * geo:neighbourhood=geo:cartier http://www.flickr.com/groups/api/discuss/72157594497877875/

RDF Due Diligence

The following provides a basic, op-ed case study on using RDF in a real-world search application for a small organization. Small organizations are resource constrained and investing in newer technology such as RDF poses special risks. The evolution of software, and the Semantic Web in particular, is a tension between a need to make something new and better, and a short-term need to make something practical and efficient.

Which Road to Web 3.0? Semantic Web Explained

Alex Iskold has written a fantastic piece on The Road to the Semantic Web "Some people think that the Semantic Web is about AI, some claim that it is more about semantics, while others say that it is about data annotation. All agree however, that we will all be wonderfully more productive and simply happier when it arrives." What is the Semantic Web?

Is "Don't be Evil" the same as "Be nice"?

Google is on top and making a grand profit. Now that the numbers for Google's profits are in, it's safe to predict that Google is on top of the search game for a long time to come. So, in the great American tradition of rooting for the underdogs, let's look at Google with the eyes of an underdog. What isn't Google? Is Google nice? They aren't evil. This is enough, right? It's a rare thing for corporations to have a double or triple bottom line. But can you say no to billions of dollars of profit when your corporate legal framework requires you to acquire business and grow? If google can only sustain the "not evil" phase that's a victory. Maybe if Google were "nice" they wouldn't survive.

PEW Study: The Future of the Internet

At first glance, the PEW report on the Future of the Internet seemed a bit juvenile. Then jumping in to it, I realized those surveyed included Internet luminaries Esther Dyson and Howard Rheingold (among others), and should be taken seriously... From the report summary: "A survey of internet leaders, activists, and analysts shows that a majority agree with predictions that by 2020: * A low-cost global network will be thriving and creating new opportunities in a “flattening� world. * Humans will remain in charge of technology, even as more activity is automated and “smart agents� proliferate. However, a significant 42% of survey respondents were pessimistic about humans’ ability to control the technology in the future. This significant majority agreed that dangers and dependencies will grow beyond our ability to stay in charge of technology. This was one of the major surprises in the survey. * Virtual reality will be compelling enough to enhance worker productivity and also spawn new addiction problems. * Tech “refuseniks� will emerge as a cultural group characterized by their choice to live off the network. Some will do this as a benign way to limit information overload, while others will commit acts of violence and terror against technology-inspired change. * People will wittingly and unwittingly disclose more about themselves, gaining some benefits in the process even as they lose some privacy. * English will be a universal language of global communications, but other languages will not be displaced. Indeed, many felt other languages such as Mandarin, would grow in prominence." Read the full PDF report.

The 7 Ways People Search the Web

What type of searcher are you? Slate distinguishs the seven ways people search using the mistakenly-released AOL search logs of 650,000 members. Or go to Valleywag to search the logs yourself. Like User 1912452, "a psychiatric counselor looking for a job in Colorado, obsessed with quick weight loss. She's turned to the book of Revelation, the zodiac, psychic schools, private investigators, and Victorian poetry. She (or a patient) dreams about being drenched in blood."
Syndicate content